Main Session
Sep 28
PQA 01 - Radiation and Cancer Physics, Sarcoma and Cutaneous Tumors

2285 - Sensitivity Analysis of Microdosimetric Lineal Energy to Parameter Variations in the Microdosimetric Kinetic Model for Carbon Ion Radiotherapy

02:30pm - 04:00pm PT
Hall F
Screen: 19
POSTER

Presenter(s)

Wan-Chin Yang, - VGHTPE, Taipei, ???

W. C. Yang; VGHTPE, Taipei, Taiwan

Purpose/Objective(s): The modified microdosimetric kinetic model (mMKM) is widely used to calculate the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) in carbon ion radiation therapy. The lineal energy y represents energy deposition per unit distance on a microscopic scale, while y* is its saturation-corrected counterpart and serves as a key component in RBE calculations. This study aims to investigate the sensitivity of y* to uncertainties in other parameters within the mMKM.

Materials/Methods: A treatment plan was created for a spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) in water, with a width of 60 mm and an energy of 350 MeV/u. The output file from the treatment planning system of a clinical case was converted into an input file and processed using PHITS (Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System), a Monte Carlo simulation tool. The spectrum of y along the beam direction was obtained from the simulation, and y* was calculated based on the y spectrum, the quadratic coefficient in LQ model (ß), domain radius (rd), and the nucleus radius (Rn). According to Inaniwa et al, the standard model parameters used in Japan, based on human salivary gland (HSG) cells, are as follows: ß = 0.0615, rd = 0.32 m, and Rn = 3.9 m. Comparisons were made between y* at the center of the SOBP and y* values obtained by individually varying the standard parameters by up to ± 50%.

Results: The y* value increases when Rn increases. A +50% and -50% variation in Rn resulted in the largest change in y*, with an increase of 15.6% and a decrease of 27.8%, respectively. The y* value decreases with increasing ß, though the effect is relatively small, with a -7.9%/+13.3% change in y* when the variation of ß is +50%/-50%. Variations in rd cause fluctuations in y* without a consistent directional trend. However, the overall impact is minimal, with the largest change being 6.4%.

Conclusion: The study indicates that y* is largely insensitive to variation in ß and rd. Although Rn has a greater impact on y*, its variation is predictable and confined in a narrow range given the limited extent of Rn variation (typically 2.5 – 5 µm in human cells). Further studies will assess the potential of y as a universal metric for radiation quality for carbon ion therapy and other particle therapy, given its relative insensitivity to other mMKM parameters, and its consistency across different tumor and normal tissues.