Main Session
Sep 29
PQA 03 - Central Nervous System, Professional Development/Medical Education

2645 - Radiation Necrosis, Pseudoprogression, and Enhancing Radiologic Changes after Photon or Proton Chemoradiotherapy for Grade 2-3 IDHmt Gliomas

08:00am - 09:00am PT
Hall F
Screen: 17
POSTER

Presenter(s)

Jessica Ortega, MD - UC Health, Cincinnati, OH

J. S. Ortega1, T. MacDonald1, A. E. Mascia1, T. D. Struve III1, L. E. Pater1, A. J. Frankart1, J. Forbes1, N. Andaluz1, K. Ahmed1, M. Gaskill-Shipley2, G. Udstuen1, M. Hagen1, R. Chaudhary3, L. Yogendran1, and K. Wang4; 1University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, 2Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, 3Division of Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, 4Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH

Purpose/Objective(s): To characterize patterns and severity of MRI contrast enhancement, pseudoprogression (PsP), and radiation necrosis (RN) after photon vs proton chemoRT for IDH-mutated (IDHmt) grade 2-3 gliomas.

Materials/Methods: We reviewed patients receiving photon or proton RT at a single academic center. Inclusion criteria: WHO grade 2-3, IDHmt, known 1p19q status, and concurrent and/or adjuvant chemotherapy. Primary endpoint: New enhancing pseudoprogression or radiation necrosis (PsP/RN), categorized as Grade 1 (asymptomatic radiologic enhancement), Grade 2 (symptomatic), and Grade =3 (admission, bevacizumab, or surgery/biopsy showing isolated or fewer tumor cells). Degree of preop enhancement, extent of surgery, and clinical target volume (CTV) were quantified. All records and images were reviewed by both a resident and senior CNS radiation oncologist. Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyze freedom from =G1 and =G2 PsP/RN (pts censored at disease progression). Factors associated at p<0.1 level on univariate analysis were included in a multivariate analysis.

Results: 108 pts received photon (n=46, median 54 Gy for WHO grade 2 and 59.4 Gy for WHO grade 3) or proton (n=62, median 54 Gy for WHO grade 2 and 60 Gy for WHO grade 3) RT from 2012-2024. Median f/u was 3 yrs (IQR 1.5-6 yrs). 52% had WHO grade 3 tumors (photons: 57%, protons: 48%) and 49% had 1p19q co-deletions (photons: 50%, protons: 48%). Median CTV was 161 cc (photons: 176 cc, protons: 155 cc). 57% had non-enhancing tumors and 66% of the 91 pts with known MGMT status were methylated. Surgical extent was biopsy in 17%, subtotal in 41%, and near/gross total in 41%. There were 38 pts with Grade =1 and 13 with Grade =2 PsP/RN (12 had grade =3 PSP/RN, and 12 had received protons). 1-year freedom from PsP/RN was higher with photon vs proton (Grade =1: 88% vs 70%, p<0.01; Grade =2: 98% vs 87%, p=0.01). Factors associated with PsP/RN on univariate analysis are shown in the Table. Protons were associated with a higher incidence of both Grade =1 and Grade =2 PsP/RN, remaining significant on multivariate analysis. Most Grade =2 events involved the ventricles and/or corpus callosum.

Conclusion: In IDHmt grade 2-3 glioma, protons were associated with a higher rate of both asymptomatic and high grade PsP/RN. These findings are relevant to clinicians interpreting post-RT imaging, provide insights on radiobiologic differences, and support a need to further optimize proton planning. Future research is needed to examine whether the higher apparent biological effect or protons translates into improved disease control.

Abstract 2645 - Table 1

Grade =1 (p, HR) Grade =2 (p, HR)

1p19q co-deletion

0.30 (1.4)

0.72 (1.2)

MGMT methylated

0.04 (2.7)

0.20 (40.4)

WHO grade 3 (vs 2)

0.11 (1.7)

0.08 (3.1)

Dose (59-60 Gy vs. 50-54 Gy)

0.21 (1.5)

0.11 (2.9)

Greater preop enhancement

0.04 (1.5)

0.59 (1.2)

Greater surgical extent

0.21 (0.8)

0.10 (0.6)

CTV (cc)

0.20 (1.0)

0.06 (1.0)

Proton (vs photon)

<0.01 (4.3)

0.03 (9.3)