Main Session
Oct
01
QP 25 - Radiation and Cancer Physics 11: Advances in Dosimetry Optimization and Adaptive Planning
1149 - Personalized Novel Isotoxic Hypofractionated Adaptive Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Lung Cancer
Presenter(s)
Simran Polce, MD - Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
S. A. Polce, N. Nasser, C. Chiodo, J. Peterson, J. Kim, J. M. Frakes, N. Thorne, I. Oraiqat, P. A. S. Johnstone, J. Brewer, V. Semenenko, G. Redler, and S. A. Rosenberg; H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Tampa, FL
Purpose/Objective(s):
Standard treatment for locally advanced (LA) lung cancer is surgery or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT), but many patients are ineligible due to co-morbidities. Sequential radiation (RT) and chemotherapy offers lower local control (LC) rates. Dose escalation and hypofractionated RT (HFRT) are emerging alternatives (Westover et al). Across 18 phase I/II HFRT trials, dose/fractionation varied, median PFS was poor (10-25 months), and rates of Grade 3 esophagitis (0.0-23.8%) and pneumonitis (0.0-11.8%) were high (Said et al). We hypothesize that online adaptive RT will enable isotoxic HFRT while improving target coverage with a novel approach.Materials/Methods:
Retrospective clinical data of 90 online adaptive RT (oART) sessions for LA lung cancer patients (n=6) treated at our center were analyzed. oART hybrid coverage required daily physicist and weekly physician presence (daily offline physician review). The oART process entailed image acquisition, patient modeling, plan generation/selection, verification with IGRT matching CBCT to CBCT, and treatment delivery. All treatment courses consisted of 15 fractions (Fx). IGTV45Gy (3Gy/Fx) structures are rigidly propagated and aligned. Critical OARs are recontoured on daily anatomy and the IGTV60 (4Gy/Fx) simultaneously integrated boost is adapted daily by subtracting these critical OARs (plus margin) from the IGTV45 volume to allow isotoxic dose delivery. Patient characteristics, critical OAR D0.03cc, target V60Gy and D90%, as well as toxicities (CTCAE V5) were collected.Results:
Patients had Stage II-IV lung cancer with at least one mediastinal target and were started on prophylactic sucralfate and pantoprazole from Fx 1 until 2 weeks post-treatment. No acute G3 Esophagitis or G3 Pneumonitis events occurred, but all patients experienced G1-2 esophagitis. 72% of Fx were led by physicists. Average time per Fx was 29.04 (± 6.57) minutes. The adapted plan improved IGTV60 V60Gy by 7.8% (± 10.3%) and D90% by 2.3% (± 4.4%) while also decreasing esophagus D0.03cc by 5.9% (± 8.1%) and proximal bronchial tree (PBT) D0.03cc by 7.3% (± 5.8%). Additional results are summarized in Table 1. Adapted plan was selected for treatment in all 90 Fx.Conclusion:
Our data demonstrates a novel isotoxic approach to HFRT that also maximizes target dose via daily oART. oART improves target dose by 7.8% while decreasing critical OAR dose by 5.9% (esophagus) and 7.3% (PBT) on average. The treatment is well tolerated with no acute G3 toxicities. Long-term follow-up is needed to assess LC and long-term toxicities. Abstract 1149 - Table 1| Structure | Metric | Goal | Reference | Scheduled | Adapted |
| IGTV60 | V60Gy | =90% | 95.0 ± 3.6 | 89.3 ± 8.4 | 95.5 ± 3.2 |
| D90% | =4.00Gy | 4.01 ± 0.08 | 3.97 ± 0.16 | 4.05 ± 0.03 | |
| Esophagus | D0.03cc | =3.42Gy | 3.12 ± 0.31 | 3.23 ± 0.42 | 3.03 ± 0.39 |
| PBT | D0.03cc | =3.69Gy | 3.52 ± 0.17 | 3.79 ± 0.34 | 3.50 ± 0.17 |